Corporate Fairness Through the Lens of Behavioral Economics

The debate over corporate social responsibility and ESG principles has reached a critical juncture, with companies facing unprecedented pressure to balance shareholder interests against broader stakeholder concerns. This tension has intensified amid political backlash against ESG initiatives, exemplified by Trump's recent "Drill, baby, drill" rhetoric.

However, traditional economic analysis – which assumes purely rational decision-making – may be insufficient to understand this complex transformation in corporate behavior and legal expectations.

This article introduces behavioral economics as a powerful but underutilized lens for examining corporate responsibility. Unlike classical economics, behavioral economics recognizes that human decisions are influenced by emotional factors, cognitive biases, and perceptions of fairness – not just profit maximization.

Through examples like the famous "ultimatum game," the research demonstrates how people consistently make decisions that prioritize fairness over personal gain, willingly sacrificing economic benefits to maintain ethical standards or punish unfair behavior.

It explores how this behavioral perspective is reshaping corporate law and governance. Legal frameworks are increasingly incorporating stakeholder fairness principles, transforming fundamental corporate law doctrines and moving beyond the traditional focus on shareholders alone.

Professor Bukspan argues that integrating behavioral economics insights into corporate strategy offers companies a compass for navigating legal risks, seizing business opportunities, and building sustainable cultures of cooperation, trust, and social responsibility.

To read the full article, visit our Hebrew main blog