How Behavioral Economics Influences Green Consumer Choices

This position paper argues that behavioral economics provides essential tools for bridging the gap between consumers' environmental values and their actual purchasing behaviors. Drawing on empirical research, Prof. Hochman demonstrates how psychological factors often prevent environmentally-conscious intentions from translating into green consumer choices.

The paper presents compelling evidence from two recent studies. The first reveals that simple taste testing can double consumer willingness to purchase aesthetically imperfect "ugly" produce – showing how direct sensory experience can overcome visual bias and potentially reduce significant food waste. The second study identifies a counterintuitive finding: consumers are generally more willing to sacrifice time than money for environmental benefits, despite money being renewable while time is not.

These findings support Prof. Hochman's central position: green consumer choices are driven less by environmental information or values, and more by subjective experience at the decision point. The paper advocates for practical applications of behavioral economics principles, including strategic placement of tasting stations, designing green defaults into purchasing systems, and simplifying environmental impact messaging.

For organizations committed to ESG principles, Prof. Hochman presents a clear stance: offering green alternatives isn't sufficient—these options must be perceived as accessible, worthwhile, and aligned with consumers' immediate needs. By incorporating psychological insights into business strategy, companies can create choice environments that enable consumers to act in accordance with environmental values without feeling they're making burdensome sacrifices.

To read the full article, visit our Hebrew main blog