The Ele-Philanthropist in the Boardroom: The Boundaries of Corporate Philanthropy

This post examines the inherent tension between the surging phenomenon of corporate philanthropy and the classical “profit maximization” doctrine in corporate law. While the rise of ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has turned community donations into a dominant practice, Israeli law is left with a lingering question regarding the “Ele-Philanthropist in the Boardroom” problem – the difficulty of classifying donations as actions that are “in the best interests of the company”.

The post proposes a shift away from the attempt to shoehorn philanthropic contributions under the narrow principle of profit maximization. Instead, it advocates for the revitalization of the concluding clause of Section 11(a) of the Israeli Companies Law, 5759-1999, as an independent legal path. By utilizing “valve concepts” such as “reasonable amount” and “worthy cause”, and by anchoring donations within the company’s Articles of Association, the post outlines a “Safe Harbor” model that balances managerial autonomy with the protection of shareholders.

לקריאת הרשומה המלאה, בקרו באתר שלנו בעברית.